Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

The Hamburg Lectures on Maritime Affairs 2007 & 2008

E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
196 Seiten
Englisch
Springer Berlin Heidelbergerschienen am03.10.20092010
In 2007, the International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), both based in Hamburg, decided to establish an annual lecture series, the 'Hamburg Lectures on Maritime Affairs' - giving distinguished scholars and practitioners the opportunity to present and discuss recent developments in the field of maritime affairs. The present volume collects seven of the lectures held in 2007 and 2008 by Thomas A. Mensah, Krijn Haak, Sergio M. Carbone, Lorenzo Schiano di Pepe, Erik Røsæg, Frank Smeele, Carlos Esplugues Mota and Lucius Caflisch.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR106,99
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR96,29

Produkt

KlappentextIn 2007, the International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), both based in Hamburg, decided to establish an annual lecture series, the 'Hamburg Lectures on Maritime Affairs' - giving distinguished scholars and practitioners the opportunity to present and discuss recent developments in the field of maritime affairs. The present volume collects seven of the lectures held in 2007 and 2008 by Thomas A. Mensah, Krijn Haak, Sergio M. Carbone, Lorenzo Schiano di Pepe, Erik Røsæg, Frank Smeele, Carlos Esplugues Mota and Lucius Caflisch.
Details
Weitere ISBN/GTIN9783642040641
ProduktartE-Book
EinbandartE-Book
FormatPDF
Format Hinweis1 - PDF Watermark
FormatE107
Erscheinungsjahr2009
Erscheinungsdatum03.10.2009
Auflage2010
Reihen-Nr.16
Seiten196 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
IllustrationenXI, 196 p. 6 illus.
Artikel-Nr.1442021
Rubriken
Genre9200

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
1;Preface;6
2;Contents;7
3;Contributors;8
4;Part I: The Hamburg Lectures 2007;11
4.1;Civil Liability and Compensation for Environmental Damage in the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea;12
4.1.1;I. State Responsibility under the 1982 Convention;12
4.1.2;II. Liability beyond State Responsibility;13
4.1.3;III. The Rationale of the Civil Liability Approach;14
4.1.4;IV. The Use of Civil Liability in International Instruments relating toDamage to the Marine Environment;16
4.1.5;V. An Example of the Civil Liability Approach: The 1969 Conventionon Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage;17
4.2;New Developments in the Field of Transport of Dangerous Goods: Presence and Prospects of the CRTD Convention;18
4.2.1;I. Oil Pollution Damage: CLC and IFC;18
4.2.2;II. Hazardous and Noxious Substances: HNS;20
4.2.3;III. Dangerous Goods: CRTD;22
4.2.4;IV. The Dutch Solution: Domestic Law in Book 8 and 6 CC;25
4.2.5;V. Restoration of the CRTD;27
4.2.6;VI. Conclusions;29
4.3;Uniform Law and Conflicts in Private Enforcement of Environmental Law: the Maritime Sector and Beyond;30
4.3.1;I. Origin and evolution of the uniform liability regime concerning oilpollution damage: the role of the practice and the emergence of asolidaristic approach;31
4.3.2;II. Codification and implementation of the mutualistic compensationsystem through private agreements and uniform law mechanisms;34
4.3.3;III. Unilateral choices in the United States of America, furtherevolution of the 1992 CLC-FUND scheme and the role played byprivate interests;39
4.3.4;IV. The Bunker Convention and the completion of the liability regimeregarding oil pollution damage;45
4.3.5;V. Choice of forum and choice of law in environmental litigationoutside the maritime sector: an overview of recent developmentsin international and EC law;47
4.3.6;VI. Directive No 35/2004 on environmental liability and its impact onchoice of forum and choice of law relating to transfrontierpollution;51
4.3.7;VII. The law applicable to liability for environmental torts inRegulation No 864/2007 ( Rome II ): an appraisal;55
4.3.8;VIII. Selected bibliography;59
5;Part II :The Hamburg Lectures 2008;61
5.1;The Athens Convention on Passenger Liability and the EU*;62
5.1.1;I. The International Regulation;63
5.1.1.1;1. The Convention;63
5.1.1.2;2. The Athens Implementation Guidelines;64
5.1.2;II. EU and the Convention;65
5.1.3;III. Some Implementation Issues;68
5.1.3.1;1. Jurisdiction and Recognition Issues;68
5.1.3.1.1;a) Introduction;68
5.1.3.1.2;b) The Actions;69
5.1.3.1.3;c) Multiple Fora;69
5.1.3.1.4;d) Actions Against Insurers, etc.;70
5.1.3.1.5;e) at the Option of the Claimant .;70
5.1.3.1.6;f) provided that the Court is State Party .;71
5.1.3.1.7;g) proper Venue within those States .;71
5.1.3.1.8;h) Domicile Forum;72
5.1.3.1.9;i) Departure or Destination Fora;72
5.1.3.1.10;j) Plaintiff s Domicile Forum;73
5.1.3.1.11;k) Contract Signing Forum;73
5.1.3.1.12;l) Forum Agreements;73
5.1.3.1.13;m) Recognition and Enforcement;74
5.1.3.1.14;n) Conclusion;74
5.1.3.2;2. Global Limitation Issues;75
5.1.3.3;3. Issues concerning Amendments and Options;76
5.1.3.3.1;a) Introduction;76
5.1.3.3.2;b) General Amendment Procedure;77
5.1.3.3.3;c) National Enhancement of per capita Limits;77
5.1.3.3.4;d) Amendments to the Guidelines;78
5.1.3.4;4. Scope Issues;79
5.1.4;IV. Ratification Issues;81
5.2;International Civil Litigation and the Pollution of the Marine Environment;83
5.2.1;I. Introduction;83
5.2.2;II. Limitation Conventions;84
5.2.3;III. Beneficiaries of Limitation or Immunity;87
5.2.4;IV. An Intermezzo: Commune de Mesquer v. Total;89
5.2.5;V. Patchwork of Limitation Regimes;92
5.2.6;VI. Claims Subject to Limitation;92
5.2.7;VII. Claim Categories and Limitation Funds;93
5.2.8;VIII. Procedural Complications;98
5.2.9;IX. Jurisdiction;98
5.2.10;X. Optional Nature of Right to Invoke Limitation of Liability;100
5.2.11;XI. Limitation Proceedings;102
5.2.12;XII. Recognition of Limitation Fund;105
5.2.13;Annex I: Decision of the Maritime and Commercial Court of Copenhagen of 11 May 2005 (The Uno Case);109
5.2.13.1;Statement of Claim;109
5.2.13.2;The Decision of the Court;112
5.2.13.3;IT IS HELD THAT;116
5.2.14;Annex II: Decision of the First Chamber of the Hoge Raad of29 September 2006, No. C05/147 HRJ MH/MK;117
5.2.14.1;1. The proceedings in the fact-finding courts;117
5.2.14.2;2. The proceedings in the cassation appeal;118
5.2.14.3;3. Evaluation of the appeal;118
5.2.14.4;4. Decision;123
5.3;Some Current Developments in International Maritime Arbitration;125
5.3.1;I. Introduction;126
5.3.2;II. The Arbitration Agreement in International Maritime Arbitration;128
5.3.2.1;1. Introduction;128
5.3.2.2;2. The Case of the Incorporation by Reference of an ArbitrationAgreement Embodied in a Third Contract in International MaritimeArbitration;131
5.3.2.2.1;a) Introduction;131
5.3.2.2.2;b) The Issue of the Charterparty s Arbitration Agreement beingIncorporated by Reference into the Bill of Lading.;134
5.3.2.2.2.1;aa) England;135
5.3.2.2.2.2;bb) United States of America.;140
5.3.2.2.2.3;cc) France;146
5.3.2.2.2.4;dd) Other countries.;150
5.3.3;III. Arbitrators in International Maritime Arbitration;152
5.3.3.1;1. Introduction;152
5.3.3.2;2. About Certain Peculiarities as regards the Arbitrator inInternational Maritime Arbitration;153
5.3.3.2.1;a) The Number of Arbitrators in International Maritime Arbitration;153
5.3.3.2.2;b) Certain Basic Traits of the Arbitrator in International Maritimearbitration: Selection of the Arbitrator s Features by the Parties;157
5.3.3.3;3. Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in InternationalMaritime Arbitration;163
5.3.4;IV. The Arbitration Procedure;165
5.3.4.1;1. Introduction;165
5.3.4.2;2. Time-Limit for Commencing International Maritime Arbitration;166
5.3.4.2.1;a) Time Limit for Bringing Suit before the Arbitration Tribunal Agreedby the Parties.;166
5.3.4.2.2;b) Legal Time-Limits.;172
5.3.5;V. The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute;175
5.3.5.1;1. Introduction;175
5.3.5.2;2. The Scope of Acceptance of Party Autonomy in InternationalMaritime Arbitration;176
5.3.5.3;3. Party Autonomy and Legal Standard of Liability of the Carrier;176
5.4;The Peaceful Settlement of Disputes on Maritime Delimitation;182
5.4.1;I. Introduction;183
5.4.1.1;1. The Need for Defining the Subject;183
5.4.1.2;2. What is Maritime Delimitation?;183
5.4.1.3;3. What is Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes?;183
5.4.1.4;4. The Importance of the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in the Fieldof Maritime Delimitation;184
5.4.1.5;5. Outline;185
5.4.2;II. The International Law of Maritime Delimitation and Related Ruleson Dispute Settlement;185
5.4.2.1;1. The Geneva Law of the Sea Conventions;185
5.4.2.1.1;a) Substantive Rules;185
5.4.2.1.2;b) Rules on Dispute Settlement;187
5.4.2.2;2. Maritime Delimitations in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law ofthe Sea;187
5.4.2.2.1;a) Substantive Rules;187
5.4.2.2.2;b) Rules on Dispute Settlement;189
5.4.3;III. Evolving Case-Law on Maritime Delimitation;190
5.4.3.1;1. Introduction;190
5.4.3.2;2. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969, sketch-map 1);191
5.4.3.3;3. The Continental Shelf Delimitation, France and United Kingdom(1977/1978, sketch-map 2);192
5.4.3.4;4. The Tunisia/Libya Case (1982, sketch-map 3);193
5.4.3.5;5. The Jan Mayen Case (1993, sketch-map 4);195
5.4.3.6;6. Contemporary Case-Law;196
5.4.3.7;7. Conclusions;196
5.4.4;IV. Conclusion: How Should Maritime Delimitation Disputes beSettled?;198
6;About the International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg;200
mehr

Autor