Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise

E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
216 Seiten
Englisch
Springer Netherlandserschienen am07.02.20092009
It is generally believed that doing science means accumulating empirical data with no or little reference to the interpretation of the data based on the scientist's th- retical framework or presuppositions. Holton (1969a) has deplored the widely accepted myth (experimenticism) according to which progress in science is presented as the inexorable result of the pursuit of logically sound conclusions from un- biguous experimental data. Surprisingly, some of the leading scientists themselves (Millikan is a good example) have contributed to perpetuate the myth with respect to modern science being essentially empirical, that is carefully tested experim- tal facts (free of a priori conceptions), leading to inductive generalizations. Based on the existing knowledge in a field of research a scientist formulates the guiding assumptions (Laudan et al. , 1988), presuppositions (Holton, 1978, 1998) and 'hard core' (Lakatos, 1970) of the research program that constitutes the imperative of presuppositions, which is not abandoned in the face of anomalous data. Laudan and his group consider the following paraphrase of Kant by Lakatos as an important guideline: philosophy of science without history of science is empty. Starting in the 1960s, this 'historical school' has attempted to redraw and replace the positivist or logical empiricist image of science that dominated for the first half of the twentieth century. Among other aspects, one that looms large in these studies is that of 'guiding assumptions' and has considerable implications for the main thesis of this monograph (Chapter 2).mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR139,09
BuchGebunden
EUR145,50
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR128,39

Produkt

KlappentextIt is generally believed that doing science means accumulating empirical data with no or little reference to the interpretation of the data based on the scientist's th- retical framework or presuppositions. Holton (1969a) has deplored the widely accepted myth (experimenticism) according to which progress in science is presented as the inexorable result of the pursuit of logically sound conclusions from un- biguous experimental data. Surprisingly, some of the leading scientists themselves (Millikan is a good example) have contributed to perpetuate the myth with respect to modern science being essentially empirical, that is carefully tested experim- tal facts (free of a priori conceptions), leading to inductive generalizations. Based on the existing knowledge in a field of research a scientist formulates the guiding assumptions (Laudan et al. , 1988), presuppositions (Holton, 1978, 1998) and 'hard core' (Lakatos, 1970) of the research program that constitutes the imperative of presuppositions, which is not abandoned in the face of anomalous data. Laudan and his group consider the following paraphrase of Kant by Lakatos as an important guideline: philosophy of science without history of science is empty. Starting in the 1960s, this 'historical school' has attempted to redraw and replace the positivist or logical empiricist image of science that dominated for the first half of the twentieth century. Among other aspects, one that looms large in these studies is that of 'guiding assumptions' and has considerable implications for the main thesis of this monograph (Chapter 2).
Details
Weitere ISBN/GTIN9781402096266
ProduktartE-Book
EinbandartE-Book
FormatPDF
Format Hinweis1 - PDF Watermark
FormatE107
Erscheinungsjahr2009
Erscheinungsdatum07.02.2009
Auflage2009
ReiheContemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education
Reihen-Nr.36
Seiten216 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
IllustrationenXIV, 216 p.
Artikel-Nr.1442939
Rubriken
Genre9200

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
1;Acknowledgments;7
2;Contents;8
3;Introduction;14
4;Quantitative Imperative Versus the Imperative of Presuppositions;21
5;Understanding Scientific Progress: From Duhem to Lakatos;39
6;Kinetic Theory: Maxwell s Presuppositions;56
7;Periodic Table of the Chemical Elements: From Mendeleev to Moseley;65
8;Foundations of Modern Atomic Theory: Thomson, Rutherford, and Bohr;84
9;Determination of the Elementary Electrical Charge: Millikan and Ehrenhaft*;105
10;Paradox of the Photoelectric Effect: Einstein and Millikan;128
11;Bending of Light in the 1919 Eclipse Experiments: Einstein and Eddington;134
12;Lewis s Covalent Bond: From Transfer of Electrons to Sharing of Electrons;145
13;Quantum Mechanics: From Bohr to Bohm;155
14;Wave-Particle Duality: De Broglie, Einstein, and Schrödinger;164
15;Searching for Quarks: Perl s Philosophy of Speculative Experiments;171
16;Conclusion: Inductive Method as a Chimera;179
17;References;191
18;Author Index;208
19;Subject Index;213mehr
Kritik
From the reviews:"The book is organized in 14 chapters and includes references, an author index and a subject index. ... The book does an excellent job in brining to the foreground the complexity that surrounds the development of ideas in science. ... Overall, the book is a valuable contribution in illustrating a face of science that is often ignored. ... The book will be useful for academics, researchers and students in history, philosophy and education of science." (Sibel Erduran, Science & Education, June, 2010)"This 14-chapter book devotes 10 chapters to historical episodes of scientific discovery and theory development in the physical sciences. ... for students of history and philosophy of science (HPS) and science education, this volume reports on important physical science episodes in the application of HPS to science education. ... Niaz's monograph is a good source for gaining insights into how history of science influenced philosophy of science." (Richard A. Duschl, Studies in Science Education, Vol. 47 (1), March, 2011)mehr