Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

Imaginary Philosophical Dialogues

between Sages down the Ages
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
209 Seiten
Englisch
Springererschienen am24.12.20201st ed. 2021
Sometimes the dialogues are about the origins of modern concepts, as when Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat discuss their invention of probability, or when John Nash and John von Neumann discuss the creation of game theory.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR32,09
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR32,09

Produkt

KlappentextSometimes the dialogues are about the origins of modern concepts, as when Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat discuss their invention of probability, or when John Nash and John von Neumann discuss the creation of game theory.
Details
ISBN/GTIN978-3-030-65386-6
ProduktartBuch
EinbandartKartoniert, Paperback
Verlag
Erscheinungsjahr2020
Erscheinungsdatum24.12.2020
Auflage1st ed. 2021
Seiten209 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
IllustrationenXII, 209 p.
Artikel-Nr.49086309

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Protagoras versus Socrates.- Diogenes versus Plato.- Aristotle versus Plato.- Eudoxus versus Aristotle.- Epicurus versus Zeno.- Sextus Empiricus versus Marcus Aurelius.- Augustine versus Hypatia.- Anselm versus Abelard.- Thomas Aquinas versus Roger Bacon.- William of Ockham versus Duns Scotus.- Thomas Hobbes versus Ren e Descartes.- Blaise Pascal versus Pierre de Fermat.- John Locke versus Thomas Hobbes.- Gottfried Leibniz versus Baruch de Spinoza.- David Hume versus Jean-Jacques Rousseau.- Immanuel Kant versus Adam Smith.- Edmund Burke versus Thomas Paine.- Jeremy Bentham versus John Stuart Mill.- Friedrich Engels versus Karl Marx.- Charles Darwin versus Gregor Mendel.- Karl Marx versus Charles Darwin.- Georg Cantor versus Bertrand Russell.- Bertrand Russell versus John Dewey.- Ludwig Wittgenstein versus David Hilbert.- Oskar Morgenstern versus John von Neumann.- Karl Popper versus Ludwig Wittgenstein.- Jean-Paul Sartre versus Simone de Beauvoir.- John Nash versus John von Neumann.- Rudolph Carnap versus Leonard Savage.- Imre Lakatos versus Karl Popper.- Robert Nozick versus David Lewis.- John Rawls versus John Harsanyi.- Derek Parfit versus John Rawls.mehr

Schlagworte

Autor

Kenneth Binmore is a mathematician turned economist and philosopher. He has held Chairs at the London School of Economics (UK), the University of Michigan (USA), and University College London (UK). He has been involved in a range of applied projects, including the design of major telecom auctions in various countries across the world. As a consequence of the $35 billion raised by the telecom auction he organized in the UK, he was described by Newsweek magazine as the "ruthless, poker-playing economist who destroyed the telecom industry". He has contributed to game theory, experimental economics, evolutionary biology and moral philosophy. His books include Natural Justice (OUP), Does Game Theory Work? (MIT Press), A Very Short Introduction to Game Theory (OUP), Rational Decisions (PUP), and Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk? (Springer).
Weitere Artikel von
Binmore, Kenneth