Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

News Media Coverage of the Vice-Presidential Selection Process

What's Wrong with the 'Veepstakes'?
BuchGebunden
137 Seiten
Englisch
Springererschienen am04.04.20232023
This book provides the first systematic, empirical analysis of the media´s approach to US vice-presidential selection (or the veepstakes ). In their news coverage, Devine finds that media outlets typically treat vice-presidential selection as little more than a game-by focusing on how potential running mates might help to win the election, rather than how they might help the next president to govern. Based on an original content analysis of hundreds of veepstakes profiles from 2000-2020, this book quantifies the news media´s relative emphasis on various selection criteria, in general and across different electoral circumstances. The analysis suggests that journalists generally fail to serve the public interest by emphasizing electoral over governing considerations. However, Devine also points to positive examples of media coverage that help the public to evaluate potential running mates´ governing credentials, and suggests ways in which scholars, journalists, and citizens might encourage media outlets to provide more substantive, responsible coverage of the vice-presidential selection process in future elections.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchGebunden
EUR48,14
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR48,14
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR48,14

Produkt

KlappentextThis book provides the first systematic, empirical analysis of the media´s approach to US vice-presidential selection (or the veepstakes ). In their news coverage, Devine finds that media outlets typically treat vice-presidential selection as little more than a game-by focusing on how potential running mates might help to win the election, rather than how they might help the next president to govern. Based on an original content analysis of hundreds of veepstakes profiles from 2000-2020, this book quantifies the news media´s relative emphasis on various selection criteria, in general and across different electoral circumstances. The analysis suggests that journalists generally fail to serve the public interest by emphasizing electoral over governing considerations. However, Devine also points to positive examples of media coverage that help the public to evaluate potential running mates´ governing credentials, and suggests ways in which scholars, journalists, and citizens might encourage media outlets to provide more substantive, responsible coverage of the vice-presidential selection process in future elections.
Details
ISBN/GTIN978-3-031-28165-5
ProduktartBuch
EinbandartGebunden
Verlag
Erscheinungsjahr2023
Erscheinungsdatum04.04.2023
Auflage2023
Seiten137 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
IllustrationenXIX, 137 p. 3 illus., 2 illus. in color.
Artikel-Nr.52003872

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Chapter 1. Introduction.- Chapter 2. How the Veepstakes Came to Be.- Chapter 3. Studying the Veepstakes.- Chapter 4. Veepstakes Media Coverage, 2000-2016.- Chapter 5. Veepstakes Media Coverage, 2020.- Chapter 6. Conclusion.mehr

Schlagworte

Autor

Christopher J. Devine is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Dayton, USA. He is the co-author of two books on vice-presidential candidates, including Do Running Mates Matter? The Influence of Vice Presidential Candidates in Presidential Elections (with Kyle C. Kopko). This research has been cited by numerous US and international media outlets. Devine also has published extensively on other topics relating to campaigns and elections, public opinion, and the U.S. presidency, including the forthcoming book on presidential campaign visits, I'm Here to Ask for Your Vote.