Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules - Previously published in hardcover
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
231 Seiten
Englisch
Springer Netherlandserschienen am29.11.20112009
In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchGebunden
EUR111,50
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR106,99
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR96,29

Produkt

KlappentextIn these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves.
ZusammenfassungIn this book, the authors report on their Systematic Empirical Research of the Conventional Validity of the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Starting from a clearly defined theoretical basis, they report about a continued series of experimental tests.
Details
ISBN/GTIN978-94-007-2601-7
ProduktartBuch
EinbandartKartoniert, Paperback
Erscheinungsjahr2011
Erscheinungsdatum29.11.2011
Auflage2009
ReiheArgumentation Library
Seiten231 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
Gewicht374 g
IllustrationenX, 231 p.
Artikel-Nr.16942730

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Theoretical Background and Organization of the Study.- Considerations Regarding the Design of the Study.- Ad Hominem Fallacies: An Exemplary Study.- The Confrontation Stage: The Freedom Rule.- The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend Rule (I).- The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II).- The Argumentation Stage: The Argument Scheme Rule.- The Concluding Stage: The Concluding Rule.- Conventional Validity of the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.mehr
Kritik
From the reviews: "This book is an excellent contribution to the study of pragma-dialectics. ... the present book is an extremely good example of how experimental studies can be designed on the basis of normative theories of argumentation. The authors have succeeded in developing a large set of well thought out experiments, and in reporting clearly about the results." (Jos Hornikx, Information Design Journal, Vol. 18 (2), 2010) "This book has varying levels of value to different scholars ... . The book has several clear merits. First, it is informative about how people view dialogical fallacies, and these results can be understood independent of the pragma-dialectical framework. Second, the research program offers consistent evidence for the conventional validity of the discussion rules at the heart of pragma-dialectics. And finally, it is a nice example of how programmatic empirical research can assist a theoretical project and move it into the domain of practical application."--- (Dale Hample, Argumentation, Vol. 24, March, 2010)mehr

Autor