Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives

Previously published in hardcover
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
236 Seiten
Englisch
Springer Netherlandserschienen am15.10.20142013
This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchGebunden
EUR149,79
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR149,79

Produkt

KlappentextThis book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence.
ZusammenfassungBased on papers presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, this book offers a comprehensive overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation.
Details
ISBN/GTIN978-94-017-8235-7
ProduktartBuch
EinbandartKartoniert, Paperback
Erscheinungsjahr2014
Erscheinungsdatum15.10.2014
Auflage2013
ReiheLaw and Philosophy Library
Seiten236 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
Gewicht385 g
IllustrationenXII, 236 p.
Artikel-Nr.15537680
Rubriken
GenreRecht

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Table of Contents.- Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris.- Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell.- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante.- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer.- Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg.- The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis.- Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the Unworthy Spouse ; Eveline Feteris.- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal.- Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson.- Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage.- The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak.- Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi.- Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann.- Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet.- Index.mehr
Kritik
From the book reviews:
"This collection of essays on legal argumentation theory should attract a broad audience of scholars from legal philosophy, argumentation, and logic. This book offers a broad range of theoretical essays that would be appropriate either as a textbook or for supplemental readings for an advanced level class on legal argumentation. ... the volume should be useful and pertinent for theorists who study legal argumentation in those locations." (Janice Schuetz, Journal of Argument in Context, Vol. 32 (2), 2014)mehr

Schlagworte