Hugendubel.info - Die B2B Online-Buchhandlung 

Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility

Formalisation and the Life-World
BuchGebunden
223 Seiten
Englisch
Springererschienen am08.12.20142015
We see that Patocka continually emphasized the relevance of Husserl´s work to existential questions relating to human responsibility and the life-world, which he admits is left largely implicit in Husserl´s work.mehr
Verfügbare Formate
BuchGebunden
EUR53,49
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR53,49
E-BookPDF1 - PDF WatermarkE-Book
EUR53,49

Produkt

KlappentextWe see that Patocka continually emphasized the relevance of Husserl´s work to existential questions relating to human responsibility and the life-world, which he admits is left largely implicit in Husserl´s work.
Zusammenfassung
Deals with the themes of critiques of formalization, life-world and responsibility

Draws together and compares Patocka s and Husserl s work on these themes

Prompts discussion on the question of responsibility against the backdrop of formalized knowledge

Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Details
ISBN/GTIN978-3-319-09827-2
ProduktartBuch
EinbandartGebunden
Verlag
Erscheinungsjahr2014
Erscheinungsdatum08.12.2014
Auflage2015
Seiten223 Seiten
SpracheEnglisch
Gewicht491 g
IllustrationenX, 223 p.
Artikel-Nr.32452772

Inhalt/Kritik

Inhaltsverzeichnis
âThe Phenomenological Critique of Formalism: Responsibility and the Life-World.- Edmund Husserl´s Die Krisis Der Europäischen Wissenschaften Und Die Transcendentale.- Phänomenologie.- Part One: Patocka´s Phenomenological Philosophy.- Jan Patocka: From the Concept Of Evidence to the Natural World and Beyond.- Patocka on Galileo.- Nostalgia and Phenomenon: Husserl and Patocka on the End of The Ancient Cosmos.- Time in Negative Platonism´.- Quicquid Cogitat´: On the Uses and Disadvantages of Subjectivity.- Part Two: Husserl´s Phenomenology.- Everydayness, Historicity and the World of Science: Husserl´s Life-World Reconsidered.- Mathesis Universalis and the Life-World: Finitude and Responsibility.- Husserl´s Hermeneutical Phenomenology of the Life-World as Culture Reconsidered.- Husserl and Heidegger on The Social Dimensions of the Life-World.- Part Three: The Continued Relevance of the Phenomenological Critique.- Formalisation and Responsibility.- Perceiving Sensible Things: Husserl and the Act of Perception.- Are We Still Afraid of Science?.mehr

Schlagworte

Autor

Dr Ľubica Ucník is a senior lecturer and academic chair in philosophy at Murdoch University. Her work is derived from Jan Patocka´s rethinking of phenomenological philosophy, namely, his concept of a-subjective phenomenology and his work on the transformation of modern science from Galileo to the present. She published several articles on Husserl´s mathematisation of the Lebenswelt and Patocka´s thinking on modern civilization. She recently completed a book The Life-World and the Crisis of Meaning: Husserl, Heidegger, Arendt and Patocka. Dr Ivan Chvatík Dr h. c. is the director of Jan Patocka Archive, an archive he established in 1990. In 1990, he received the Prize from the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences for the Jan Patocka Archive Collection , published in underground 1977-1989. Since 1993, he has been the co-director of the Center for Theoretical Study, the Institute for Advanced Study at Charles University and the Czech Academy of Sciences. In 1997, he received Jan Patocka Memorial Medal from the Czech Academy of Sciences in recognition of his role in furthering scientific research. Since 1990, he has edited 25 volumes of Jan Patocka's life works. Dr Anita Williams is a researcher in philosophy and psychology at Murdoch University. Her research is broadly focused on the history and philosophy of psychology. She is interested in phenomenology because it provides a way to question the increasingly taken for granted adoption of the scientific method for investigating human thinking and morality. Her recent work adopts Husserl´s and Heidegger´s critiques of formalisation to critique the expanding field of cognitive neuroscience.